
Again, Atlas Shrugged shows up as something of a rallying point for politically concerned and, perhaps, frustrated citizens. I pasted an excerpt from an
article in US News and World Report, talking about the phenomenon of Ayn Rand.
One of the strangest—but perhaps, predictable—trends that has accompanied the recession is a resurgence of interest in the writings of Ayn Rand and especially, the book Atlas Shrugged. Sales of the book have apparently soared over the last year. The book's hero, John Galt, has become a rallying figure for anti-big-government activists.
You might have seen the latest appropriation of Randian thought in your newspaper: one of the ads used by the Employment Policies Institute (started by famous lobbyist Rick Berman) as part of a new campaign called Defeat The Debt. Check out the ad here.
Still, there are critics. But there's a lot of over-simplification and caraciture-creation going on. Those who try to minimize Ayn Rand's message say that
Atlas Shrugged is just "pro-big business propaganda" as if Orren Boyle and Jim Taggart weren't prominent characters in the novel. Others say that Rand's characters are uni-dimensional and "perfect" as if the mistakes of Hank Rearden and Dagny Taggart aren't a huge part of the story-line.
I wonder if it just takes a second reading.
1 comments:
I have to wonder why the words "pro-big business propaganda" have taken on a negative connotation so self evident that the phrase alone is sufficient to negate any further thought on the subject in so many people today. Is not "big business" equal to "big success" in a general enough way to make it a rule? And adding "pro" to the front should make this "approving big success" and the word "propaganda" at the end should make this "spreading the word about approving big success". Sure, many big businesses have become big stepping on and often snapping the spines of those more deserving, but these are still the exception, not the rule.
Post a Comment